Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT CASEBOOK

SEARCH

  • Google

    WWW
    http://justcrim.typepad.com/deathpenalty/

CLUSTRMAPS

Hotspotr

delicious.com/brianrwuci

JURIST

NYT

NPR

My Photo

« [prop 8 writ petition] | Main | what must change »

November 10, 2008

victim impact videos

"Court turns aside test on “victim impact videos”  [Monday, November 10th, 2008 12:22 pm | Lyle Denniston] ~ SCOTUSBLOG

"The Supreme Court refused on Monday, over the protests of three Justices, to provide new guidance on the kinds of “victim impact” evidence that may be put before jurors to try to convince them to impose a death sentence. Specifically, the Court turned down two appeals seeking to challenge the use of music and video portrayals that may be highly emotional. It would have taken the votes of four Justices to grant review; three said the Court should have examined anew that kind of evidence...

"In the new “victim impact” cases, Justice John Paul Stevens noted that the Court has not reviewed that type of evidence since its ruling 17 years ago in Payne v. Tennessee [501 U.S. 808 (1991)] — the first ruling to allow the introduction, in the sentencing phase of capital cases, testimony that seeks to show the impact of the crime on relatives and other survivors of the victim.

“In the years since Payne was decided,” Stevens wrote Monday, “this Court has left state and federal courts unguided in their efforts to police the hazy boundaries between permissible victim impact evidence and its impermissible, ‘unduly prejudicial’ forms….Having decided to tolerate the introduction of evidence that puts a heavy thumb on the prosecutor’s side of the scale in death cases, the Court has a duty to consider what reasonable limits should be placed on its use.” ... The cases denied review were ` and Zamudio v. California (07-11425)..."  [Justice Stevens’ statement respecting the denial is available here, and Justice Breyer’s dissent from the denial is available here.]

The California Supreme Court decisions are available free online @ People v. Douglas Oliver Kelly, 42 Cal. 4th 763; 171 P.3d 548; 68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 531 (2007) and People v. Zamudio (2008)43 Cal.4th 327 , -- Cal.Rptr.3d --; -- P.3d -- [No. S074414. Apr. 21, 2008.] ...

The Cali decisions are also available @ the California Courts official site.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834555e0469e2010535e2a091970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference victim impact videos:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

AROUND1

FOCUS

BOOK SEARCH

SCHOLAR

PreCYdent

open house

  • The Open House Project

VIII

STATEAGENCIES

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad

cc